Soto

Soto v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20212:19-cv-00910California496 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SILVIA SOTO, an individual, LATANYA No. 2:19-cv-0910 TLN DB ANDREWS, an individual, M.M.S., a minor, and M.M.S., a minor, by and through their guardian ad litem, SILVIA SOTO, in each case both individually and ORDER as successors-in-interest to the ESTATE OF MARSHALLMILES, Deceased, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, BLAKE

GRINDER, KENNETH LLOYD, JOHN

HIGLEY, ANDREW GARSIDE, GREG

WHITE, KELLEY BUNN, GREGORY

JOHNSON, CHARLES GAILEY, SCOTT

JONES, PATRICIA ROBINSON-HARD

and Does 1 through 100, et al, Defendants. 22 On February 18, 2021, defendants filed a motion to quash a subpoena served by plaintiffs pursuant to Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and noticed the motion for hearing before the undersigned on March 12, 2021, pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(1). (ECF No. 57.) On March 5, 2021, the parties filed a Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement. (ECF No. 59.) Non-expert discovery in this action, however, must have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.