Cantu

Cantu v. Kings County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20211:20-cv-00538California12,424 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 1:20-cv-00538-NONE-SAB Document 19 Filed 03/08/21 Page 1 of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROGER CANTU, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-00538-NONE-SAB

Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING GRANTING IN PART

v. AND DENYING IN PART COUNTY

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

KINGS COUNTY, et al., AND GRANTING DEFENDANT

NAPHCARE’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 17, 18)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

Currently before the Court are two motions to dismiss filed by Kings County, David

20 Robinson, Kings County Sheriff, Kings County Sheriff Department (hereafter “County

21 Defendants”), and NaphCare, Inc. (hereafter “Defendant NaphCare”). (ECF Nos. 6, 10.) The

22 matters have been referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

23 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. (ECF No. 15.) The Court, having…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.