Kuersten

(PC) Edwards v. Kuersten

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20212:21-cv-00259California899 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID E. EDWARDS, No. 2:21-cv-0259-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

M. KUERSTEN, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). For the reasons stated below, the court finds that plaintiff has not demonstrated he is eligible to proceed in forma pauperis. A prisoner may not proceed in forma pauperis:

if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.

25 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Court records reflect that on at least three prior occasions,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.