(PS)Thacker
(PS)Thacker v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID C. THACKER, No. 2:20-cv-00255-KJM-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &
RECOMMENDATIONS
AT&T CORPORATION, et al., (ECF No. 42) Defendants. 16 Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. (ECF No. 42.) The court took the motion under submission, finding it suitable for resolution without oral argument. (ECF No. 44.) See Local Rule 230(g). After considering plaintiff’s motion and supporting papers, the opposition, and plaintiff’s reply (ECF Nos. 42, 43, 45), the court recommends that leave to amend be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this action in California small claims court in December 2019 against AT&T Corporation and Diversified Consultants, Inc. (“DCI”). (ECF No. 1.1.) Defendants, then both represented by the same counsel, removed the action to this court. (ECF No. 1.) In July 2020, the court permitted…