Sutton

(PC) Cooley v. Sutton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20211:19-cv-01804California1,424 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODERICK G. COOLEY, No. 1:19-cv-0001804-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT

THIS CASE BE DISMISSED WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE1

JOHN SUTTON, Warden OBJECTIONS DUE IN THIRTY DAYS

Defendant. ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

16 I. FACTS AND BACKGROUND Plaintiff Roderick G. Cooley is a current or former state prisoner proceeding pro se on his civil rights complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. No. 1. On April 15, 2020, the former magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s complaint and directed plaintiff to file an amended complaint within sixty (60) days. Doc. No. 7. Plaintiff was duly advised that his failure to file an amended complaint will result in a dismissal of this action. Id. at ¶2. As of this date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint and the time to do so has expired. See docket. Further, on November 25, 2020, mail sent from the court to plaintiff was returned as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.