(PS) Williams v. Chime Solutions, Inc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TYWON WILLIAMS, No. 2:20–cv–2299–KJM–KJN PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

v. (ECF No. 4) CHIME SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against several defendants, alleging violation of various federal statutes for seemingly separate harms; plaintiff also requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (See ECF Nos. 1, 2.) The court granted plaintiff’s IFP request and dismissed the complaint under Rule 8(a) for failure to state a discernable claim for relief, and Rule 20(a) for joining multiple defendants in the same suit without showing a connection between the claims or defendants. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff was given 28 days to amend the complaint and was warned that failure to do so by the required deadline could result in sanctions, including “dismissal of the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).” (Id. at…