Hillman, III v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20212:20-cv-01601California5,691 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CONSTANGY, BROOKS, SMITH & PROPHETE LLP

JASMINE L. ANDERSON (SBN 252973)

janderson@constangy.com 601 Montgomery Street, Suite 350 3 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 918-3000 Facsimile: (415) 918-3017 5 Attorneys for Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

GOULD & ASSOCIATES

AARIN A. ZEIF (SBN 247088)

aarin@wageandhourlaw.com A Professional Law Corporation 9 17822 East 17th Street, Suite 106 Tustin, CA 92780 Telephone: (714) 669-2850 Facsimile: (714) 554-0800

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DEWAYNE HILLMAN III

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16 DEWAYNE HILLMAN III, an individual Ca se No. 2:20-CV-01601-WBS-KJN 17 Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER vs.

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY,

and DOES 1 THROUGH 25,

Defendants.

24 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 25 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 26 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure 27 and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.