Newsom

(PC) Abreu v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20211:21-cv-00303California395 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARMANDO ABREU, Case No. 1:21-cv-00303-NONE-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., (Doc. 9)

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Armando Abreu is a state prison appearing pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He requests the appointment of counsel to represent him in this case. (Doc. 9.) Plaintiffs do not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in section 1983 actions, Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), and the Court cannot require an attorney to represent a party under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), see Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 304-05 (1989). However, in “exceptional circumstances,” the Court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to section 1915(e)(1). Rand, 113 F.3d at 1525. Given that the Court has no reasonable method of securing and compensating counsel, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.