Agame
(PC) Henderson v. Agame
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARY DELMAR HENDERSON, Case No. 1:20-cv-00635-JLT (PC)
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
TO DISMISS CLAIMS AND DEFENDANT
v.
G. AGAME, et al., 14-DAY DEADLINE
Defendants. Clerk of the Court to Assign a District Judge 16 On February 6, 2021, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and found that it states a cognizable claim against Defendant Agame for a violation of the First Amendment. (Doc. 13.) The remaining claims were not cognizable. (Id.) The Court therefore directed Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint curing the deficiencies in his pleading or to notify the Court that he wishes to proceed only on the claim found cognizable. (Id.) On March 8, 2021, Plaintiff filed a notice that he “wishes to proceed on only the First Amendment claim” against Defendant Agame. (Doc. 14.) Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth in the Court’s screening order (Doc. 13), the Court RECOMMENDS that: 1.…