Rouse

(PC) Hunter v. Rouse

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20212:20-cv-00159California596 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER, No. 2:20-cv-0159 WBS DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ROUSE, et al., Defendant. 15 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration. (ECF No. 31.) For the reasons set forth below, the court will recommend that plaintiff’s motion be denied. By order dated May 15, 2020, the district court found that plaintiff had accrued three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) prior to filing this action. (ECF No. 24.) Plaintiff was directed to pay the filing fee within forty-five days. Thereafter, plaintiff sought and was granted additional time to pay the filing fee. (ECF Nos. 25, 30.) Plaintiff moved for an injunctive relief directing his bank to release funds to pay the filing fee. (ECF No. 25.) The court denied his request and provided instructions for paying the filing fee. (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.