(PS)Nguyen

(PS)Nguyen v. Yolo County District Attorney Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20212:21-cv-00239California2,677 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HUNG M NGUYEN, No. 2:21–cv–00239–TLN–KJN PS Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IFP STATUS;

ORDER DENYING RECUSAL;

v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO YOLO COUNTY DISTRICT DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE,

(ECF Nos. 1, 2, 3) Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, who proceeds in this action without counsel, has moved for the undersigned to recuse, and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 2, 3.) Plaintiff’s IFP application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and so the request to proceed IFP is granted. However, the determination that a plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis does not complete the required inquiry. Under Section 1915, the court is directed to dismiss at any time if it determines the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against an immune defendant. Here, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.