Edwards

(PC) Cardenas v. Edwards

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20212:19-cv-01066California1,176 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DANNY CARDENAS, Jr., No. 2:19-cv-1066 MCE DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS B.S. EDWARDS, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment. This action was closed on August 13, 2020. (ECF Nos. 20, 21.) Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to vacate the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 22.) For the reasons set forth below, the court will recommend that plaintiff’s motion to vacate be granted and this action be reopened for the limited purpose of allowing plaintiff to file objections. I. Backgrounds The undersigned issued findings and recommendations on March 16, 2020 because plaintiff had failed to state any potential cognizable claims and failed to cure the defects noted in the prior screening orders. (ECF No. 17.) The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.