(PC)Jordan

(PC)Jordan v. Arcee

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20211:20-cv-01658California439 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOLAN JORDAN, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01658-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN

DEFENDANTS AND CLAIMS

ARCEE, et al., ) ) (ECF Nos. 15, 18) Defendants. ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Nolan Jordan is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 3, 2021, the undersigned screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim for deliberate indifference against Defendants Arcee and the unidentified ICC members. (ECF No. 15.) However, Plaintiff was advised that he failed to state any other cognizable claims. (Id.) Plaintiff was granted the opportunity to file an amended complaint or a notice of intent to proceed on the claim found to be cognizable. (Id.) On March 10, 2021, Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.