Eaton

(HC) Hinzman v. Eaton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20212:20-cv-02280California419 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN GENE HINZMAN, Jr., No. 2:20-cv-02280 GGH P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

P. EATON, Warden, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254. The matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302(c). On December 7, 2020, the court granted petitioner thirty days to file an amended habeas petition in compliance with the court’s instructions. ECF No. 4. On January 27, 2021, the court issued an order to show cause ordering petitioner to show cause within 14 days, why this matter should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or to follow a court order pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(b). ECF No. 5. Petitioner was further informed that the filing of an //// //// //// //// amended petition within the timeframe would…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.