Kernan

(PC) Thornberry v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20212:17-cv-00953California17,095 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:17-cv-00953-TLN-DMC Document 118 Filed 03/12/21 Page 1 of

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL LEE THORNBERRY, No. 2:17-CV-0953-TLN-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER KERNAN, et al., Defendants.

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983. Before the Court are the parties’ respective motions for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 104,

111. The undersigned United States Magistrate Judge resolves Defendants’ motion and

recommends granting summary judgment in Defendants’ favor. The Court thus does not address

Plaintiff’s motion, which is necessarily mooted by granting summary judgment to Defendants. The

Court concludes that Defendants are entitled to summary judgment generally and does not address

Defendants’ asserted defense of qualified immunity.

///

///

///

///

/// 1 Case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.