(PS) Deuschel v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20212:20-cv-00661California1,662 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAURIE A. DEUSCHEL, No. 2:20-cv-00661 KJM AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC and HUNT & HENRIQUES, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se, and pre-trial proceedings are accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Defendant Hunt & Henriques seeks dismissal of plaintiff’s case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, on the grounds that this case is barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. ECF No. 21 at 6. I. BACKGROUND A. The Complaint Plaintiff Laurie A. Deuschel’s complaint against defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (“Portfolio”) and the law firm Hunt & Henriques, Attorneys at Law is based on violations (1) the California Fair Credit Reporting Act, and (2) the federal and state Fair Debt Collection Practices Acts. ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.