Restivo

(PC) Harris v. Restivo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20211:20-cv-00797California591 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEVONTE B. HARRIS, No. 1:20-cv-00797-NONE-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

v. (Doc. No. 17) A. RESTIVO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Devonte Harris is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 25, 2021, the undersigned adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations, ordering that “[t]his case proceed on Plaintiff’s retaliation claims against defendants Levan and Restivo; Plaintiff’s section 1983 malicious prosecution claims against defendants Levan and Restivo; and Plaintiff’s Devereaux claims against defendants Levan, Reynolds, and Restivo,” and that “[a]ll other claims and defendants be dismissed.” (Doc. No. 14 at 4.) On February 19, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the order adopting the findings and recommendations, arguing that the court erred in dismissing claims four, thirteen,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.