O'Campo

(PC) Crump v. O'Campo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20212:20-cv-02343California1,447 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVE CRUMP, No. 2:20-cv-2343 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

A. O’CAMPO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, and seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s renewed motion for preliminary injunction is before the court. (ECF No. 31.) As discussed below, the undersigned recommends that plaintiff’s motion be denied. I. Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint This action proceeds on plaintiff’s amended complaint against defendant O’Campo. Plaintiff alleges the following. In October of 2019, after allegedly conflicting responses as to whether defendant O’Campo would renew plaintiff’s single cell chrono, plaintiff filed health care grievances against O’Campo based on her revoking his single cell status. In retaliation for such grievances, defendant allegedly threatened to house plaintiff with a gang member, then, through 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.