Baeza

(PC) John E. Mitchell v. Baeza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20211:20-cv-00857California734 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOHN EDWARD MITCHELL, Case No. 1:20-cv-00857-HBK (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE

WHY THIS ACTION IS NOT BARRED BY

v. THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS

H. BAEZA, et al., (Doc. Nos. 1, 10)

Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

16 This matter comes before the court for its initial screening following reassignment to the undersigned. (See Doc. No. 9). John Edward Mitchell (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner commenced this action by filing a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on June 22, 2020. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on November 23, 2020, which the court deems the operative pleading. (Doc. No. 10). Because the claims asserted in the amended complaint relate back to the original complaint, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 (c), the court utilizes the date the original complaint was delivered to correctional officials mailing as the date the complaint was filed for 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.