Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United States Bureau of Reclamation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE, No. 1:20-CV-01814-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING FEDERAL
DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF STAY RECLAMATION, et al., (Doc. No. 47) Defendant. 16 The matter is before the court on the Federal Defendants’ unopposed motion to stay. This court, in its sole discretion, can stay this litigation pursuant to its inherent power to control its own docket. Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936). When reviewing a stay request, courts generally consider five factors: 1. the interest of the plaintiffs in proceeding expeditiously with this litigation or any particular aspect of it, and the potential prejudice to plaintiffs of a delay; 2. the burden which any particular aspect of the proceedings may impose on defendants; 24 3. the convenience of the court in the management of its cases, and the efficient…