Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United States Bureau of Reclamation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20211:20-cv-01814California381 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE, No. 1:20-CV-01814-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING FEDERAL

DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO

UNITED STATES BUREAU OF STAY RECLAMATION, et al., (Doc. No. 47) Defendant. 16 The matter is before the court on the Federal Defendants’ unopposed motion to stay. This court, in its sole discretion, can stay this litigation pursuant to its inherent power to control its own docket. Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936). When reviewing a stay request, courts generally consider five factors: 1. the interest of the plaintiffs in proceeding expeditiously with this litigation or any particular aspect of it, and the potential prejudice to plaintiffs of a delay; 2. the burden which any particular aspect of the proceedings may impose on defendants; 24 3. the convenience of the court in the management of its cases, and the efficient…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.