Mansour

(PC) Williams v. Mansour

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20212:20-cv-00616California348 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MICHAEL TRAVON WILLIAMS, No. 2:20-cv-0616 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER YASSER MANSOUR, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action, has requested appointment of counsel on the grounds that his jailhouse lawyer is no longer available to help him, the institution where he is housed is on lockdown due to the Covid-19 pandemic, and he is uneducated in the law. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the district court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). The test for exceptional circumstances requires the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.