Acevedo

Acevedo v. Russell Cellular, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20211:20-cv-01440California7,316 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCO ACEVEDO, Case No. 1:20-cv-01440-NONE-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING GRANTING

v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL

ARBITRATION AND STAY

RUSSELL CELLULAR, INC., PROCEEDINGS

Defendant. (ECF Nos. 7, 9, 10, 13)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

17 Currently before the Court is Russell Cellular, Inc.’s motion to compel arbitration and stay this action which has been referred to the United Sates magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. (ECF No. 11.) The Court, having reviewed the record, finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 230(g). I. BACKGROUND Marco Acevedo (“Plaintiff”) began working for Russell Cellular, Inc. (“Defendant”) around November 11, 2019. (Decl. of Robert Lister (“Lister Decl.”) ¶ 6, ECF No. 7-3.) In connection with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.