(PC) Driver v. USDC for Eastern District of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20212:20-cv-01158California327 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILLY DRIVER, JR., No. 2:20-CV-1158-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER U.S. DISTRICT COURT, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Eastern District of California local rules. On December 22, 2020, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. ECF No. 19. The findings and recommendations were served on the Plaintiff, which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. Plaintiff has not filed objections. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.