Kesteloot

(PC) Burnett v. Kesteloot

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20212:20-cv-00400California1,563 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ESTER BURNETT, No. 2:20-cv-0400 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND KESTELOOT, FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s first amended complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will recommend that the pleading be dismissed without leave to amend. I. Screening Requirement The in forma pauperis statute provides, “Notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that may have been paid, the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that . . . the action or appeal . . . fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). II. Pleading Standard Section 1983 “provides a cause of action for the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.