(SS) (CONSENT) Honeycutt v. Commissioner of Social Security

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL JOHN HONEYCUTT, No. 2:19-cv-01619 AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying his application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act (“the Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-34. For the reasons that follow, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment will be DENIED, and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment will be GRANTED. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff applied for disability insurance benefits (DIB) under Title II of the Social Security Act (Act) 42 U.S.C. §§ 401 et seq. in November 2012, alleging that he became disabled as of September 9, 2003, due to a panic disorder and multiple sclerosis (“MS”). Administrative

DIB is paid to disabled persons who have contributed to the Disability Insurance…