D.D.

D.D. v. County of Kern

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20211:20-cv-00064California146 words

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 D.D., a minor, by and through his father and Case No. 1:20-cv-00064-DAD-JLT guardian ad litem Tom Durbin, ORDER CLOSING THE CASE Plaintiff, (Doc. 27) 13 vs. 14

COUNTY OF KERN;

MARCUS CLOUD; and DOES 1-10, 16 Defendants. 17

The parties have settled their case and have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 27) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 15, 2021 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26 27