Pickett

(PC) Garces v. Pickett

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20212:17-cv-00319California7,528 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LUIS MANUEL GARCES, No. 2:17-cv-0319 JAM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. PICKETT, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the court are the parties’ motions to compel (ECF Nos. 123, 139) and plaintiff’s motions for reconsideration (ECF No. 133), to stay (ECF Nos. 134, 141), and for appointment of counsel (ECF Nos. 140, 141). I. Defendants’ Motion to Compel On December 22, 2020, defendants filed a motion to compel, ECF No. 139, but plaintiff has not responded to the motion. Plaintiff will be given one more opportunity to respond to the motion to compel and is cautioned that failure to respond will be construed as consent to the court granting the motion. In light of the pending motion to compel, the dispositive motion deadline will be vacated and re-set upon resolution of the outstanding discovery dispute. 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.