Eldridge

(HC) Briscoe, III v. Eldridge

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20211:19-cv-00389California2,012 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES ROBERT BRISCOE, III, No. 1:19-cv-00389-DAD-JLT (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS IN PART

MICHAEL MARTEL,

Respondent. (Doc. Nos. 17, 52)

17 Petitioner James Robert Briscoe, III, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 3, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that the petition of writ of habeas corpus be denied. (Doc. No. 52.) These findings and recommendations were served upon petitioner and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of service of that order. (Id. at 9.) After the granting of multiple extensions of time to do so, on June 29, 2020, 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.