(HC)Bouras

(HC)Bouras v. Martel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 17, 20212:17-cv-00649California483 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGE JOHN BOURAS, No. 2:17-cv-0649 TLN CKD P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MICHAEL MARTEL, Respondent. 16 On January 11, 2021, petitioner was ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed. Petitioner was warned that failure to respond to the order to show cause would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The time for responding to the order to show cause has expired and petitioner has not responded. Although it appears from the file that petitioner’s copy of the order to show cause was returned, petitioner was properly served. It is the petitioner’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. ///// ///// ///// ///// Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that 1. Petitioner’s petition for a writ…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.