Anders

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAYLOR ANDERS, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00179-AWI-BAM Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY

v. (Doc. 9) CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FRESNO, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Expedited Discovery. (Doc. 9.) The Court finds the motion suitable for decision without oral argument, and the matter is deemed submitted. For the reasons outlined below, Plaintiffs’ request for leave to conduct expedited discovery shall be denied. I. Background1 On February 12, 2021, Plaintiffs filed their complaint against California State University, Fresno, and its officials (“Defendants”), alleging that Defendants violated Title IX of the Education

1 In the interest of conserving judicial resources and to expedite a ruling in light of the pending 26 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, the Court does not provide a detailed background of the parties’ case. The Court also does not provide a…