Rios

(PC) Atkins v. Rios

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20211:20-cv-00193California553 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MCKINLEY PIERCE ATKINS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00193-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO

v. OBEY COURT ORDERS AND FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM

E. ROCHA, et al., 14-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. Clerk of the Court to Assign a District Judge 16 On June 7, 2020, the Court issued a screening order directing Plaintiff, within 21 days, to file a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies in his pleading or a notice of voluntary dismissal. (Doc. 9.) The Court cautioned Plaintiff that failure to comply with the screening order would result in a recommendation “that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim and to obey a court order.” (Id. at 8.) Although the Court has granted Plaintiff four extensions of time spanning nearly 250 days (see Docs. 11, 14, 16, 18), Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal within the time provided. The Local…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.