(PC)Flores

(PC)Flores v. California Correctional Women's Facility

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20211:19-cv-01509California696 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ENID MARIE FLORES, Case No.: 1:19-cv-01509-NONE-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

v.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL EXTENSION OF TIME WOMEN’S FACILITY, et al., (Doc. 26) Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

17 The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found it failed to state a cognizable claim. (Doc. 21.) The Court directed her to file a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified by the Court in the screening order, a notice of voluntary dismissal, or a notice of election to stand on the complaint. Plaintiff previously sought and was granted an extension of time to file a response. She now seeks a second extension of time. Good cause appearing, this request will be granted. In addition, plaintiff moves for the appointment of counsel on the ground that she has fallen into a “deep depression” and has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.