Allen

(PC) Hernandez v. Allen

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20212:20-cv-01661California2,462 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY C. HERNANDEZ, No. 2:20-cv-1661 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ALLEN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims jail officials violated his rights while he was confined to the Amador County Jail. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 2, 8) and his amended complaint for screening (ECF No. 11). For the reasons set forth below, the court will grant the motions to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the amended complaints with leave to amend. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 2, 8.) Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.