Sexton

(PC) Washington v. Sexton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20211:18-cv-00513California188 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMIEN WASHINGTON, Case No. 1:18-cv-0513-DAD-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO APPOINT COUNSEL

v. (Doc. 61) M. SEXTON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied. Accordingly, plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 17, 2021…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.