(PS) Stewart v. Property and Casualty Ins. Co. of Hartford

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20212:17-cv-02418California550 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 COLLEEN STEWART, No. 2:17-cv-02418-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER

v. PROPERTY AND CASUALTY

INSURANCE CO. OF HARTFORD,

14 Defendant. 15 16 Plaintiff Colleen Stewart (“Plaintiff”), currently proceeding pro se,1 brings this civil action against Defendant Property and Casualty Insurance Co. of Hartford (“Defendant”) for alleged breach of insurance contract and bad faith. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 21, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 86.) No objections were filed within those 14 days. However, after Plaintiff communicated with the courtroom deputy for ///

Plaintiff was represented by counsel when she initiated this lawsuit in 2017, but counsel subsequently…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.