Long
(HC) Jones v. Long
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL LEE JONES, No. 2:19-cv-01261-TLN-KJN Petitioner, v. ORDER J. LONG, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner Paul Lee Jones (“Petitioner”), a prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 2, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 25.) On December 30, 2020, Petitioner was granted a sixty (60) day extension of time to file objections. (ECF No. 27.) Sixty days passed and Petitioner did not file objections. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir.…