Pizana

Pizana v. Sanmedica International LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20211:18-cv-00644California3,161 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

. 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 RAUL PIZANA, individually and on No. 1:18-cv-00644-DAD-SKO behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S Plaintiff, MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO v. SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM TO CLARKSON LAW FIRM AND TYCHO &

SANMEDICA INTERNATIONAL, LLC, ZAVAREEI

and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, (Doc. 138) Defendants.

12 This matter is before the Court on Defendant SanMedica International, LLC’s “Motion to Compel Production of Documents in Response to Subpoenas Duces Tecum to Clarkson Law Firm and Tycho & Zavareei” (the “Motion to Compel”). (Doc. 138.) Defendant and non-party counsel for Plaintiff Raul Pizana—Clarkson Law firm, P.C. (“CLF”) and Tycho & Zavareei, LLP (“TZ”) (collectively, “Plaintiff’s Counsel”)—filed their joint statement directed to the Motion to Compel (the “Joint Statement”), as required by this Court’s Local Rule 251,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.