(PC)Arceo

(PC)Arceo v. Tetreault

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20212:20-cv-02339California896 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY ARCEO, No. 2:20-cv-2339 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER GABRIELLE TETREFAULT, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a civil detainee proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 15, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. After the findings and recommendations issued, plaintiff was transferred to the county jail for his upcoming trial in San Joaquin County. (ECF No. 13.) In his objections, plaintiff first claims he does not have access to his legal materials or to legal research,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.