Doe
(PC) Heim v. Doe
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20211:20-cv-00391California540 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CHRISTOPHER HEIM, 1:20-cv-00391-AWI-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF
LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT
vs.
ORDER FOR CLERK TO FILE
JANE DOE, et al., SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
LODGED ON JANUARY 4, 2021
Defendants. (ECF No. 16.)
17 I. BACKGROUND Christopher Heim (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on March 11, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) On May 14, 2020, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint as a matter of course. (ECF No. 13.) On January 4, 2021, Plaintiff lodged a Second Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 16.) II. LEAVE TO AMEND – RULE 15(a) Under Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party may amend the party’s pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). …