Haggard

(PC) Schanck v. Haggard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20212:18-cv-00328California2,696 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM KEITH SCHANCK, No. 2:18-cv-0328 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER LORI HAGGARD, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a former federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). ECF No. 2. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. II. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners1 seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are 27 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.