Foss

(HC) Quintero v. Foss

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20212:20-cv-00200California668 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAURENCIO MARTINEZ QUINTERO, No. 2:20-cv-00200-TLN-CKD Petitioner, v. ORDER TAMMY FOSS, Respondent. 16 Petitioner Laurencio Martinez Quintero (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 29, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 28.) On February 16, 2021, Petitioner timely filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations.1 (ECF No. 31.) /// 27 Plaintiff requested and was granted a 60-day extension of time to file objections. (ECF Nos. 29, 30.) In accordance with the provisions of 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.