(PC) Maxwell v. Mitchell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20212:15-cv-00015California13,369 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:15-cv-00015-JAM-DMC Document 71 Filed 03/22/21 Page 1 of

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY PAUL MAXWELL, No. 2:15-CV-0015-JAM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RYON MITCHELL, et al., Defendants.

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court are Defendants’ motion for summary judgement,

ECF No. 61, Plaintiff’s opposition, ECF No. 65, and Defendants’ reply, ECF No. 66.

20 I. BACKGROUND

A. Plaintiff’s Allegations

Plaintiff, Anthony Paul Maxwell, names the following as Defendants in his first

amended complaint: (1) Ryon Mitchell; (2) Kevin Hass; (3) Ford Porter; (4) Kirk Trostle; (5) the

City of Chico Police Department; (6) the City of Chico; (7) Jeff Greeson; (8) the County of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.