Kerner

(PS) Wade v. Kerner

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20212:20-cv-01791California1,464 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 E. K. WADE, No. 2:20–cv–1791–KJM–KJN PS Plaintiff, ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE v. HENRY J. KERNER, Defendant. 16 On September 4, 2020, plaintiff filed this action against Robert Mueller and Henry Kerner and moved for a preliminary injunction. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) Plaintiff has since voluntarily dismissed his claims against Mr. Mueller. (ECF Nos. 14, 16.) The operative First Amended Complaint names Mr. Kerner, the current Special Counsel for the United States Office of Special Counsel (“OSC”), in his individual capacity; plaintiff seeks to hold Mr. Kerner liable for failing /// /// /// /// 26 27 1 Because plaintiff is appearing pro se, this action proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). to process or investigate a whistleblower complaint plaintiff filed with the OSC. (ECF No. 9 at 1-3.) On October 21, 2020, the court issued findings and recommendations that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.