Mansour

(PC) Williams v. Mansour

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20212:20-cv-00616California359 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL TRAVON WILLIAMS, No. 2:20-cv-0616 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND YASSER MANSOUR, et al., FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 By order filed November 12, 2020, plaintiff’s complaint was screened and found to state a cognizable Eighth Amendment medical indifference claim against Dr. Mansour and an Americans with Disabilities Act claim against Gilbert Williams. Plaintiff’s remaining claims were not cognizable as pled. Plaintiff was then granted thirty days to provide notice as to whether he wished to proceed with the complaint as screened, to stand on his complaint, or to dismiss this action entirely. Plaintiff was subsequently granted an extension of time to respond to the screening order. The deadline to file a response has now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a district judge be assigned to this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.