Phan

(PC) Demisi v. Phan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20212:20-cv-01692California323 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MOHAMMAD KHALID DEMISI, No. 2:20-cv-01692-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER STEPHANIE PHAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Mohammad Khalid Demisi (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 25, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 12.) No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.