Romero

(PC) Barth v. Romero

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20212:19-cv-00891California5,105 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAWN DAMON BARTH, No. 2:19-CV-0891-JAM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ROMERO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, ECF No. 19.1 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if it: (1) is frivolous or malicious; (2) fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; or (3) seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). Moreover,

After Plaintiff filed his original complaint, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint as of right. See ECF No. 6. The Court dismissed the first amended complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.