(PS) Lull v. County of Placer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20212:19-cv-02444California1,318 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER LULL, No. 2:19-cv-02444 KJM AC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS COUNTY OF PLACER, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for relief from the undersigned’s Findings and Recommendations suggesting dismissal of his complaint with partial leave to amend, brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). ECF No. 20. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, and accordingly the motion was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff also noticed the motion before the undersigned. ECF No. 20. For the reasons that follow, the motion should be DENIED. I. RELEVANT FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On February 13, 2020, defendants in this case filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. ECF No. 11. The undersigned recommended that the motion be granted but that plaintiff be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.