Williams v. Aetna Inc
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, No. 1:21-cv-00321-NONE-EPG Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER v. ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO: AETNA, INC., et al., (1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; OR Defendants. (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE WISHES TO STAND ON HIS
COMPLAINT
17 (ECF NO. 1)
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
19 Plaintiff Prince Paul Raymond Williams (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on March 3, 2021. (ECF No. 1). The Complaint brings claims against Plaintiff’s former employer and two other employees concerning wage garnishment. The Court finds that the Complaint fails to state any cognizable claims. After Plaintiff reviews this order, Plaintiff can decide to file an amended complaint, which the Court will screen in due course. If Plaintiff chooses to file an amended…