Biter

(PC) Baca v. Biter

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20211:15-cv-01916California2,288 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANK BACA, Case No. 1:15cv1916-DAD-HBK (PC) Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

v. GRANT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DEFER

RULING ON THE DEFENDANTS’

MARTIN BITER, ET. AL., RESPECTIVE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS1 (Doc. No. 186) Defendants.

DEFENDANTS’ RESPECTIVE MOTIONS FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE DEFERRED (Doc. Nos. 169, 170)

OBJECTIONS WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS

18 19 Pending before the Court are motions for summary judgment filed on behalf of 20 Defendants Dr. Jonathan Akanno and Dr. F. Igbinosa (Doc. No. 169) and on behalf of J. Bal, M. 21 Bparai, L. Carmichael, J. Carick, Larry Dielo, E. Dos Santos, R. Kanan, D. Ralston, G. Song, S. 22 Tharratt, A Vasudeva. (Doc. No. 170). Plaintiff filed a response to the defendants’ respective 23 motions for summary judgment seeking deferral or denial of defendants’ respective motions 24 under Rule 56(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 260(b). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.