Biter
(PC) Baca v. Biter
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANK BACA, Case No. 1:15cv1916-DAD-HBK (PC) Plaintiff,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
v. GRANT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DEFER
RULING ON THE DEFENDANTS’
MARTIN BITER, ET. AL., RESPECTIVE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS1 (Doc. No. 186) Defendants.
DEFENDANTS’ RESPECTIVE MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE DEFERRED (Doc. Nos. 169, 170)
OBJECTIONS WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS
18 19 Pending before the Court are motions for summary judgment filed on behalf of 20 Defendants Dr. Jonathan Akanno and Dr. F. Igbinosa (Doc. No. 169) and on behalf of J. Bal, M. 21 Bparai, L. Carmichael, J. Carick, Larry Dielo, E. Dos Santos, R. Kanan, D. Ralston, G. Song, S. 22 Tharratt, A Vasudeva. (Doc. No. 170). Plaintiff filed a response to the defendants’ respective 23 motions for summary judgment seeking deferral or denial of defendants’ respective motions 24 under Rule 56(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 260(b). …