Jasso

(PC) Petillo v. Jasso

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20211:19-cv-00908California612 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISAIAH J. PETILLO No. 1:19-cv-00908-NONE-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

v. (Doc. No. 18) REYNALDO JASSO, et al. Defendants. 16 On January 22, 2020, this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, was dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to pay the filing fee and judgment was entered. (Doc. Nos. 16, 17.) On July 27, 2020, plaintiff filed the instant motion for reconsideration. (Doc. No. 18.) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) governs the reconsideration of final orders of the district court. Rule 60(b) permits a district court to relieve a party from a final order or judgment on grounds of: “(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence . . .; (3) fraud . . . of an adverse party; (4) the judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied . . . or (6) any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.” Fed. R. Civ.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.